Chris wrote:
I have diff experience, I get around 7500kB/sec max windows to windows
using realtek, and freebsd can get the same but uses less cpu in doing
so, I put it down to realtek just been poor and the FreeBSD and
windows drivers not been great, I have seen both windows and FreeBSD
handle h
I have diff experience, I get around 7500kB/sec max windows to windows
using realtek, and freebsd can get the same but uses less cpu in doing
so, I put it down to realtek just been poor and the FreeBSD and
windows drivers not been great, I have seen both windows and FreeBSD
handle higher transfer r
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote:
> Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is
> too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in
> getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed.
If I take that your "NE2
On 7/27/05, Eric Schuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew P. wrote:
> > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello all!
> >>>
> >>>I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> >>>workstation
On 7/27/05, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> > I am now able to reach 11-12
On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:48, Andrew P. wrote:
> > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote:
> > > > Hello all!
> > > >
> > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes
On 7/27/05, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> > I am now able to reach 11-12
On 7/27/05, Graham Bentley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's
> > not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least
> > 99%-Windows-networking-compatible.
>
> Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible
> with Windows.
>
> (Until M$ changes someth
On 7/26/05, Andrew P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows
> 2000/XP machines with all
> "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's
> not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least
> 99%-Windows-networking-compatible.
Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible
with Windows.
(Until M$ changes something ie tries to fix its own bugs
and makes some others OR are new 'fea
Andrew P. wrote:
On 7/27/05, Casey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all!
I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows
2000/XP mach
Andrew P. wrote:
On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote:
Hello all!
I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
I am now able to reach 11
On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> > I am now able to reach 11-1
On 7/27/05, Casey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows
> > 2000/XP machi
You might be right in a sense, but like I said: Windows-to-Windows
file transfers can easily be sustained at 11-12Mbytes/s. That's up to
over 90% of 100Mbit bandwidth. In fact, if you review the theoretical
part of Ethernet and TCP/IP, you'd find that it's very possible.
On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez <[
> Hello all!
>
> I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
> workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
> I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows
> 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware.
>
> B
Let me fix my typo here.
I get 60+Mbits out of 100Mbits on a 10/100 network.
The Max SUSTAINED thru-put you will ever see will be around 70Mbits.
There is an overhead that means that you will only see .7 of the
theoretical.
-Sean
On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote:
Erm, we
Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is
too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in
getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed.
Thanks for your 2 cents anyway,
Andrew P.
On 7/27/05, Sean Hafeez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get 60+Mbytes be
I get 60+Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Mac via NFS. I get
40-60Mbytes between my FreeBSD 5.4 and Windows 2K box via Samba. Good
NICs help. Intel 10/100 Pro.
Google for Samba tuning also.
-Sean
On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:00 PM, Andrew P. wrote:
Hello all!
I remember being able to reach 1
Hello all!
I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95
workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cable.
I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows
2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardware.
But I have neve
20 matches
Mail list logo
