On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:51 PM, Igor Robul wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean umount.
Background fsck does not work well with big filesystems, it can
literaly
make server
OK I stand corrected...
softupdates reduces the possibility of having to fsck a filesystem
;-)
--
Martin
On 8/5/06, Freminlins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/08/06, Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:35:31PM +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean umount.
Background fsck does not work well with big filesystems, it can literaly
make server useless for long period of time, sometimes I just boot
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean umount.
On 8/3/06, N. Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Lutz Rabing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
is someone still working on the bigdisk project?
it becomes
more an more easy to create disk arrays
On 05/08/06, Martin Hepworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Softupdates removes the issue if havinh to fsck filesystems after and
unclean umount.
No it doesn't. Absolutely not.
After an unclean shutdown fsck runs in the background. And sometimes it
can't do that. Here's an example:
Jul 23
hi all,
is someone still working on the bigdisk project? it becomes
more an more easy to create disk arrays bigger than 2TB ... it
would be a really nice to have feature.
lutz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--- Lutz Rabing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
is someone still working on the bigdisk project?
it becomes
more an more easy to create disk arrays bigger than
2TB ... it
would be a really nice to have feature.
lutz
Nice to have, but I wouldn't want to fsck it! :)
Nicole
