Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Sunday 30 December 2007 05:27:15 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler.
out of curiosity, if the ULE is becoming the standard, then why does the
GENERIC config still have the 4BSD as the default?
Release engineers wanted to be conservative in
On Sunday 30 December 2007 05:27:15 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Yes, ULE is the recommended scheduler.
out of curiosity, if the ULE is becoming the standard, then why does the
GENERIC config still have the 4BSD as the default?
im curious to know, since im rebuilding a badly-behaving 7.0-RC1 box th
