On Feb 27, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2006 04:53, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
I would wonder about Adaptec support. Areca is officially supporting
FreeBSD (and Solaris 10 and others).
The Adaptec website claims that the 2820 is compatible with FreeB
On Saturday 25 February 2006 00:06, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> In short, I would recommend the card if you need speed under FreeBSD.
Thanks for the info Mike. I get a good feeling about Areca. Looks like we'll
be going with them. Nobody else seems to match them for board quality or
support.
Ashley
On Saturday 25 February 2006 04:53, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> I would wonder about Adaptec support. Areca is officially supporting
> FreeBSD (and Solaris 10 and others).
The Adaptec website claims that the 2820 is compatible with FreeBSD 5.4 but
doesn't mention 6. I noticed that ab
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
I'm trying to decide whether to go with an Areca ARC-1120 or an
Adeptec 2820
for a database server. The Promise SuperTrak EX8350 is out of the
question
because it lacks FreeBSD support.
I would wonder about Adaptec support. Areca is offic
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:16:00 +, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
>
>One server supplier says customer's he's supplie with ARC boards were unhappy
>with them, but didn't give any specific reasons. Does anyone have any
>experience with either of these on FBSD?
>
>There's a long co
I'm trying to decide whether to go with an Areca ARC-1120 or an Adeptec 2820
for a database server. The Promise SuperTrak EX8350 is out of the question
because it lacks FreeBSD support.
One server supplier says customer's he's supplie with ARC boards were unhappy
with them, but didn't give any
