> I have a few threads that might need as long as a minute or more to
> complete and terminate. If they exceed an arbitrary time, they can be
> canceled.
>
> In Win32, there is a 'wait on multiple objects' call. I'm not sure if it
> blocks or spins, but it *does* take a timeout argument.
How ab
>>> I'd like to start the init threads, put the id's in an array, block until
>>> they are all done, then continue. Each thread should have its own
>>> timeout
>>> handling internally.
>It seems to me that you are complicating the issue for no
>good reason. Why are you using threads at all?
1.
I have a few threads that might need as long as a minute or more to
complete and terminate. If they exceed an arbitrary time, they can be
canceled.
In Win32, there is a 'wait on multiple objects' call. I'm not sure if it
blocks or spins, but it *does* take a timeout argument.
Is there a simila
