Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE

2005-11-04 Thread Subhro
Ian Lord sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/4/2005 9:28: Hi, I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the system starts to behave strangely. During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, syste

Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE

2005-11-04 Thread Ian Lord
Sorry about the rc.conf mistake, I should sleep more at night instead of typing stupidities :) I was meaning /usr/src/sys/amd64/config/MYKERNEL I am running freebsd 5.4 amd64 version Should there be a big improvement from running ULE ?, nobody reported the bug I have with it ? Thanks At 03

Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE

2005-11-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58:58PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Hi, > > I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 > > as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the > system starts to behave strangely. > > During boot, named and sshd can't start

Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE

2005-11-03 Thread Ian Lord
Hi, I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the system starts to behave strangely. During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, system is unstable, etc Is that a known bug or isnt it suppos