Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-10 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2004-05-10T12:38:54Z, Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This sounds like a good idea. I will do this now, so I just have to remember to build CUPS again after the world. Not really. The NO_LPR=yes flag tells the make system not to build or install any of the lpr files again, ever,

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-10 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How about this in /etc/make.conf: CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes NO_LPR=yes This sounds like a good idea. I will do this now, so I just have to remember to build CUPS again after the world. Thanks! Kai ___ [EMAIL

Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Kai Grossjohann
The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This means that entering lpr -Pfoo doesn't work for printing on my machine, I have to say /usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo. It is obvious that I could change $PATH to mention /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin, but is that the right

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 06:55:54PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote: The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This means that entering lpr -Pfoo doesn't work for printing on my machine, I have to say /usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo. It is obvious that I could change

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Andreas Kohn
On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 18:55, Kai Grossjohann wrote: The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This means that entering lpr -Pfoo doesn't work for printing on my machine, I have to say /usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo. It is obvious that I could change $PATH to mention

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Robert Storey
Dear Kai, This problem can be solved by making file /usr/bin/lp* non-executable, like this: chmod -x /usr/bin/lp* regards, Robert On Sat, 08 May 2004 18:55:54 +0200 Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2004-05-08T16:55:54Z, Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This means that entering lpr -Pfoo doesn't work for printing on my machine, I have to say /usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo. Is there any reason you can't delete

Re: Built-in lpr vs CUPS

2004-05-08 Thread Rob
Kirk Strauser wrote: At 2004-05-08T16:55:54Z, Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The default setup is to include /usr/bin before /usr/local/bin in $PATH. This means that entering lpr -Pfoo doesn't work for printing on my machine, I have to say /usr/local/bin/lpr -Pfoo. Is there any reason