On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ian Lord wrote:
Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was clear ULE was a
better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Schedulers are one of the hardest things to do right in OS design, as they
rely a great deal
I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes in
the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
On the linux box, which we're moving from, I have dual Xeon HTT's that I have
JBoss scheduled round-robin with the CPU affinity set to the first two
processors,
nice -15. I have Postgres
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote:
I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes in
the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the
workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the
Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was clear ULE was
a better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Thanks
At 19:05 2005-11-09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote:
I can't find any
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was clear ULE was
a better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Yes, in the workloads I have tested. Others have reported similar
