On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:01:53PM +, RW wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 12:58, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:48:28PM +1000, Warren wrote:
> > > is there a particular reason why the ports INDEX file is del each time
> > > cvsup is run and then re-d/l in a portupgrade ?
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 12:58, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:48:28PM +1000, Warren wrote:
> > is there a particular reason why the ports INDEX file is del each time
> > cvsup is run and then re-d/l in a portupgrade ?
>
> Yes, see /usr/ports/UPDATING or the mailing list archiv
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:48:28PM +1000, Warren wrote:
> is there a particular reason why the ports INDEX file is del each time cvsup
> is run and then re-d/l in a portupgrade ?
Because it's almost certainly quicker to download a new copy from FreeBSD
than it is to let your ports system build i
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:48:28PM +1000, Warren wrote:
> is there a particular reason why the ports INDEX file is del each time cvsup
> is run and then re-d/l in a portupgrade ?
Yes, see /usr/ports/UPDATING or the mailing list archives of ports@
for extensive discussion.
Kris
pgp96tyojQnjS.pg
is there a particular reason why the ports INDEX file is del each time cvsup
is run and then re-d/l in a portupgrade ?
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
http://www.shinji.nq.nu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis