On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC c...@shire.net
wrote:
No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share
the routing tables. It works. Try it.
You're clearly exploiting a bug in
Hi All
OK, so I have a server that has been running FreeBSD 6.1 and a bunch of jails,
providing a few limited services. I am migrating these from real hardware and
FreeBSD 6.1 with jail running, to a Xen based VPS running FreeBSD 9.0-R with a
kernel rebuild from a GENERIC kernel to GENERIC
Do I understand this right?
Working in FreeBSD 6.x:
interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 -- public IP, host only
192.168.1.1/24 -- private IP, host only
192.168.1.2/24 -- Jail #1
192.168.1.3/24 -- Jail #2
With this configuration you had no problems accessing the
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Do I understand this right?
Working in FreeBSD 6.x:
interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 -- public IP, host only
192.168.1.1/24 -- private IP, host only
192.168.1.2/24 -- Jail #1
192.168.1.3/24 -- Jail #2
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
c...@shire.net wrote:
No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they
share the routing tables. It works. Try it.
You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails. It must get confused
and send your
