FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread David Gethings
Would you believe it was a jumper on the HD that was causing all the problems. The HD is setup as the primary IDE master, but the jumper settings on the HD were not configured as such. Once the correct jumper settings were in place fdisk behaved normally. I'd like to add that I bought the PC as

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:18 AM 12.20.2002 +, David Gethings wrote: On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:15, Laszlo Vagner wrote: western digital is notorious for that, what brand are you using? just curious. Maxtor something-or-other. Dg Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpers would

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jud
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:29:56 -0600, Jack L. Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: At 11:18 AM 12.20.2002 +, David Gethings wrote: On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 11:15, Laszlo Vagner wrote: western digital is notorious for that, what brand are you using? just curious. Maxtor something-or-other. Dg

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Chad Albert
Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpers would NOT work properly -- according to the BIOS on several different machines tried. Had to do the opposite of the diagrams for mastering, but slaves would NOT work period on either one. One died after a couple of

Re: FIXED: fdisk and HD's larger than 2GB

2002-12-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:20 PM 12.20.2002 -0600, Chad Albert wrote: Beware of Quantum Fireballs -- bought two of the 40GBers and the jumpers would NOT work properly -- according to the BIOS on several different machines tried. Had to do the opposite of the diagrams for mastering, but slaves would NOT work