Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-19 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 2:45 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 6/18/2010 2:33 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I should mention that I don't think it is actually dumping core. It's just reporting the problem in

Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with: portupgrade -f * I have rebooted. I am still seeing these log messages: (perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11 The long running perl processes on this system are

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Glen Barber
Hi, On 6/18/10 2:24 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with: portupgrade -f * I have rebooted. I am still seeing these log messages: (perl5.10.1), uid 0: exited on signal 11 The long

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 1:27 PM, Glen Barber wrote: Hi, On 6/18/10 2:24 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I have rebuilt world to today's 8.1-PRERELEASE sources I have forced a rebuild of every port on the system with: portupgrade -f * I have rebooted. I am still seeing these log messages:

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Glen Barber
On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade afterwards? I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran perl-after-upgrade. Wouldn't the 'portupgrade -f *' take care of this, or should I go run the script now, just in

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 1:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote: On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade afterwards? I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran perl-after-upgrade. Wouldn't the 'portupgrade -f *' take care of

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 1:52 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 6/18/2010 1:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote: On 6/18/10 2:30 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Have you recently upgraded perl without running perl-after-upgrade afterwards? I did upgrade perl some time ago. I do not recall if I ran perl-after-upgrade.

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I should mention that I don't think it is actually dumping core. It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages... You'll only get a core file if the current working directory of the process is

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I should mention that I don't think it is actually dumping core. It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages... You'll only get a core file if the current working directory of the process is

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I should mention that I don't think it is actually dumping core. It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages... You'll only get a

Re: Followup On Perl Dumping Core

2010-06-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/18/2010 2:33 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 6/18/2010 2:09 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 18/06/2010 19:56:26, Tim Daneliuk wrote: I should mention that I don't think it is actually dumping core. It's just reporting the problem in /var/log/messages... You'll only get a core