I appreciate everyone's input on this matter and the bottom line is:
mod_php and/or php-fpm should be created as a _separate_package_
for users who have no need for it, should _NOT_ install it in fact if
this package exists or not it shouldn't even concern you (since you
not using it)
for users w
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:14:30 +0100
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>
> >> Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people
> >> who don't even
On 1/10/12 5:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
>>
>> On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>>> Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build
On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>>
>
> [...]
>
>>
>> Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
>> don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
>> module* just because they
Op 10-1-2012 15:32, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be
*another* package that actually includes the module, like for example
a package called "mod_php5", it would install the stuff from php5 +
the apache module.
That is the way CentOS handl
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
[...]
>
> Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who
> don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache
> module* just because they installed PHP.
>
>
> A possible alternative that would kee
On 1/10/12 3:09 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>> Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
>>>
>>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> I created a
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
>>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the
>> precompiled packa
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 22:52, alexus wrote:
> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>
> pkg_add -r apache22
> pkg_add -r php5
>
> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
> I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
>
>
`grep php /usr/local/et
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
>>
>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apac
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinf
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled
package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form of an Apache
module, other folks use it
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter wrote:
>> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>>
>> pkg_add -r apache22
>> pkg_add -r php5
>>
>> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
>> I see source
> I created a jail and within a jail I did
>
> pkg_add -r apache22
> pkg_add -r php5
>
> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
> I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
I don't think the package has the apache mod
I created a jail and within a jail I did
pkg_add -r apache22
pkg_add -r php5
now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php,
I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-quest
17 matches
Mail list logo