On 7/19/07, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 18, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Michael Vaughn wrote: > Hello everyone, Hi-- > I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope > someone > helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4 Please don't cross-post between multiple FreeBSD lists; pick the most appropriate one. [ ... ] > Right after starting apache, the loads on the server will climb to > 10-40's > and the application will become unacceptably slow. This will go on > until few > users are using the said application. (note: other servers running > older > FreeBSD versions on dual cpus running the same code don't exhibit this > system% problem) top shows more than 60% of the CPU time is spent > on system: > > CPU states: 19.9% user, 0.0% nice, 73.7% system, 1.7% interrupt, > 4.7% idle > Mem: 398M Active, 2226M Inact, 253M Wired, 202M Cache, 214M Buf, > 567M Free > > The apache processes look like: > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 56882 www 1 103 0 139M 17516K select 0 0:03 12.66% httpd > 56862 www 1 100 0 139M 21168K CPU2 6 0:06 11.87% httpd > 56830 www 1 99 0 138M 19684K select 2 0:09 10.76% httpd > 56887 www 1 105 0 139M 17488K select 6 0:01 10.49% httpd [ ... ] Your Apache processes are huge; mine typically stay under 20MB in VSIZE even with PHP loaded (this is Apache-2.0.59 + PHP 4.4.7 or PHP 5.2.x). I suspect your PHP app(s) are leaking memory or otherwise have some significant problems with the way they are coded.
The SIZE is huge; What they really use is about 20-30Mb as would be
expected.
I had to lower MaxClients on apache substancially from 128 to 32, > or loads > would quickly go to 40+. (Other servers with dual cpus instead of > quad and > apache 1.3 on freebsd 6.0 don't have this problem) The fact that your server starts dogging out around 40 processes is not surprising-- 40 * ~140MB per httpd child = 5600 MB, which exceeds the available physical memory in the system, at which point you start swapping excessively and the performance is going to plummet.
Swap: 8000M Total, 8000M Free You will have to find a way to make those httpd children smaller or
else reduce the max number you run to 30 or less.
I have tried disabling pecl-APC and I already have most of the modules commented out on httpd.conf. Nothing special running, other than php & extensions, and mod_security2. The least I got was 70Mb per child.
Now this web application isn't the best code out there, but this is > a quad > cpu server and it's performing a lot worse than some servers I have > running > with 6.0 with apache 1.3 for over 400 days. > > Am I the only one getting terrible performance with apache2 on > FreeBSD 6 ? Apache-2.0 + PHP does just fine for me; I'm not sure that Apache-2.2 + PHP5 has been as well tested or is as lightweight in resources as the older Apache 1.3 or 2.0 flavors are. It might be worth downgrading to an older Apache to test things out, but it really does sound like the web app you've got is the problem more than FreeBSD 6 or the rest of your infrastructure.... I might give 2.0 a go; I felt this was worth mentioning because most of the cpu time is spent on system, even with just 32 MaxClients.
Do note I mentioned the same app runs on inferior, with loads of 0-4 (not optimal, but there is no noticeable slowdown there) on FreeBSD 6.0/i386 apache 1.3 (this is 6.2-STABLE/amd64 apache 2.2.4), and that is also part of the reason I went ahead and mailed the list. It doesn't make sense that a server with twice the ram, twice the processors and a recent OS version is spending 70% of the time in system% whereas the old servers running for 400+ days spend about 25% in system%. Thanks for your reply. Also --
-Chuck
_______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
