-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?
Daniel writes:
would not these things be worthy
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:48:05 -0500 (EST), Jerry McAllister wrote:
would not these things be worthy of implementing in FreeBSD? this way
other big companies would use it, pay you guys for it and FreeBSD will
grow stronger...
making a good OS that runs on cheap, low-end machines is nice,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 12:04 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?
by making money i did not meant necessarily big bank acocunts
On Friday 25 February 2005 12:04 am, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i hardly think that companies that use and enhance FreeBSD adding
features that they (and maybe others) need, would submit back those
enhacements - BSD license...
Happens all the time - the goodwill is stronger than the
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:02:20 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
would not these things be worthy of implementing in FreeBSD? this way
other big companies would use it, pay you guys for it and FreeBSD will
grow stronger...
There are other obstacles to deployment of FreeBSD in large
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Daniel, if I'm running a big company and I pay a developer a chunk of
change for a distributed FreeBSD server manager program, or some such
thing like that, I am not going to pay them if they are going to take
the money and run out and work on their own projects.
Daniel writes:
well, if a big company pays for support, those money would allow
FreeBSD to have some more people (developers or not) focus on giving
the support (fixing/answering) while the developers do their job...i
believe this is quite natural course of action
Paying for support would
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:10:57 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
well, if a big company pays for support, those money would allow
FreeBSD to have some more people (developers or not) focus on giving
the support (fixing/answering) while the developers do their job...i
believe this is quite
Daniel writes:
my scenario was this: i'm a big company and i use FreeBSD coz it
suites best for my needs; let's say among others that my/a programming
team built something on top of it ;
because i want the system to work as flawless as possible i pay a
monthly fee for support - say some 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
Daniel, if I'm running a big company and I pay a developer a chunk of
change for a distributed FreeBSD server manager program, or some such
thing like that, I am not going to pay them if they are going to take
the money and run out and work
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
What the contracting company then does with the code is their own
business.
It's not giving it away for free. Contractors are even worse than their
clients.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
sorry, i should have sent this to entire list...
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:43:32 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote among others...
FreeBSD does not have some of the things - such as distributed management
of hundreds to thousands of FreeBSD servers over a large enterprise -
that
are a requirement
sorry, i should have sent this to entire list...
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:43:32 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote among others...
FreeBSD does not have some of the things - such as distributed management
of hundreds to thousands of FreeBSD servers over a large enterprise -
that
are a
Daniel writes:
would not these things be worthy of implementing in FreeBSD? this way
other big companies would use it, pay you guys for it and FreeBSD will
grow stronger...
There are other obstacles to deployment of FreeBSD in large
organizations. The main one is a lack of formal, guaranteed
14 matches
Mail list logo
