On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2005 10:51 CEST schrieb Dmitry Mityugov:
On 8/31/05, Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Thank you for the offer, but I thought people had some simple test results
in mind. If you next time use rdump or large NFS transfers to another GbE
connected (and fast enough) box just watch the system load (I use systat
-vm 1) and see what card causes what interrupt
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other
GigaBit NICs (1000baseTX only).
AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which doesn't saturate a [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like em does)?
I heard that the re is way better than the not so
On 2005-08-31 00:46, Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm quiet disappointed with the em nics and wanted to try some other GigaBit
NICs (1000baseTX only). AFAIK there are re, sk, bge driven cards. Which
doesn't saturate a [EMAIL PROTECTED] at 200mbit/s with interrupt load (like
