On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 05:38:50PM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 January 2006 16:25, Will Maier pondered:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:56:32PM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> > > I have never even heard of "frox" before, but after some
> > > googling it turns out that it's a GPL
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 17:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] pondered:
> sendmail_enable="NONE" would do the same as all that other crap mentioned
> i find it a waste of time trying to figure out how a hacker got in just
> format the machine reinstall freebsd and secure the box up a bit and try
> updating
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 16:25, Will Maier pondered:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:56:32PM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> > I have never even heard of "frox" before, but after some googling
> > it turns out that it's a GPL'ed transparent ftp proxy...
>
> Where's it pointing?
No idea, I only we
sendmail_enable="NONE" would do the same as all that other crap mentioned
i find it a waste of time trying to figure out how a hacker got in just
format the machine reinstall freebsd and secure the box up a bit and try
updating it when vulnerabilitie are out. And this shouldnt happen again
>> Also
Also, I said smtp ports were open on the machines in question, I just verified
that I can send emails via BOTH these systems even though no
sendmail/exim/whatever was ever installed by me and sendmail_enable="None" on
both.
For what it's worth, to disable senmail on 5.0 and later, you need:
s
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:56:32PM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> I have never even heard of "frox" before, but after some googling
> it turns out that it's a GPL'ed transparent ftp proxy...
Where's it pointing?
> Also, I said smtp ports were open on the machines in question, I
> just verified t
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 14:34, Ken Stevenson pondered:
> Is there any chance you have a router that's forwarding the ports
> in question to another computer?
Not that I know of. The setup is quite simple:
wireless ethernet(PPPoE) ethernet
ISP<--->Modem<-->
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 19:27, Micheal Patterson pondered:
> > > The 1663 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
> > > PORT STATE SERVICE
> > > 80/tcp open http
> > > 554/tcp open rtsp
> > > 1755/tcp o
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 19:27, Micheal Patterson pondered:
> > The 1663 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
> > PORT STATE SERVICE
> > 80/tcp open http
> > 554/tcp open rtsp
> > 1755/tcp open wms
> > 5190/tcp open aol
>
> Kilian, what does a sockstat show you on
- Original Message -
From: "Kilian Hagemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: Have I been hacked or is nmap wrong?
Hi there,
I'm managing two FreeBSD based gateways, one running 5.2.1-RELEASE and the
other 5.3-STABLE,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Kilian Hagemann wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm managing two FreeBSD based gateways, one running 5.2.1-RELEASE and the
> other 5.3-STABLE, both not having been updated since I installed from ISO
> images. They both have custom ipfw firewalls that are dropping
Hi there,
I'm managing two FreeBSD based gateways, one running 5.2.1-RELEASE and the
other 5.3-STABLE, both not having been updated since I installed from ISO
images. They both have custom ipfw firewalls that are dropping pretty much
everything that's not supposed to come in.
All was fine and
12 matches
Mail list logo
