Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
(OT, yes, but I'd like to take a stab at explaining why these things
fall to the wayside..)
On 7 July 2011 12:08, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the point to even start looking at an issue?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is
particularly interesting. But it is not likely to happen in FreeBSD
where FreeBSD committers
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
For the record, I would like to see enforced public review for _every_
patch *before* it is checked in, as a strong rule. gcc system is
Hi,
[re-sent publicly, I did not Replied-to-all:)]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
For the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 05:50:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe
On 07/06/11 23:49, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 7/6/11, Hartmann, O.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
Let's face, ULE is not a silver bullet.
Or perhaps it is, but this particular problem is so heavily armored
as to demand depleted uranium :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 06/07/2011 20:11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
I've seen exactly this problem with multi-threaded math libraries, as
well. Using parallel GotoBLAS on FreeBSD gives terrible performance
because the threads keep migrating between CPUs, causing frequent cache
misses.
On both schedulers?
(OT, yes, but I'd like to take a stab at explaining why these things
fall to the wayside..)
On 7 July 2011 12:08, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the point to even start looking at an issue? You guys
(by you, I mean official committers on public list) don't care
When
When performing an update on the ports tree via portsnap fetch update
or when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying
large data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical
modelings) or when compiling world, FreeBD 9.0 and FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE
tend to freeze
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
having performance issues
Could you post /etc/sysctl.conf and /boot/loader.conf? Also, the
output of uname -a on all machines would be nice.
And since you don't use GENERIC, could you also tell us what
difference your setup is from a GENERIC
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
When performing an update on the ports tree via portsnap fetch update or
when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical modelings) or
when compiling world,
On Wed Jul 6 11, arrowdodger wrote:
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
When performing an update on the ports tree via portsnap fetch update or
when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from
On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
2011/7/6 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
When performing an update on the ports tree via portsnap fetch update or
when checking out (or) large Subversion repositories or when copying large
data files (~ 50 to 250 GB in size, results from numerical
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
If you are using MPI in numerical codes, then
On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
back to the old SCHED_4BSD scheduler.
If you are
Has anyone re-run those IO benchmarks?
Something smells fishy there.. (with the benchmarking.)
adrian
2011/7/6 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
On 07/06/11 12:37, arrowdodger wrote:
2011/7/6 O. Hartmannohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
When performing an update on the ports tree via
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 07/06/11 18:28, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions
In message 20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Steve Kargl w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
on one node in my cluster for jeffr to use. He was too busy to
investigate at
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Steve Kargl
w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
on one
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since it is supposed to be performing
better on multicore boxes, but there are lots of suggestions switching
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I use SCHED_ULE on all machines, since
On 07/06/11 13:00, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message20110706170132.ga68...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Steve Kargl w
rites:
I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
last three years. Nothing has changed.
On 7/6/11, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:29:24PM
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
thanks,
Adrian
On 7 July 2011 05:00, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 07/06/11 21:36, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:18:35PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Kargl
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
And, 4BSD works.
--
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
And, 4BSD works.
I meant it as a more general observation.
If something doesn't
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:39:00AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
And, 4BSD
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 July 2011 09:51, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:51AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Offer a bounty for getting it fixed?
steve == ENOMONEY jeffr == ENOTIME
30 matches
Mail list logo
