jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which tool would be able to do this sort of thing best and how might it
have been done.
PF has most of the bits you need built in, see eg
http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/bruteforce.html (part of a PF
tutorial).
For weeding out old table entries, you might
Ack, it looks like it would limp through doing the simple job wanted.
The good news is that I can make it work. The bad news is that it's
apparently so much simpler with the Linux iptables facilities. I can
see I have a bunch of reading to do before setting up to replace the
firewall machine.
Peter wrote:
--- Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in
the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was
--- Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
--- Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely
From: Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nce writeup. I do have one question at the bottom.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was some bug in IPF for 5.x some version
that forced me to switch after an upgrade. The bug has been fixed since
but I have found no reason to go back.
There are two
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
.
I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
ipfilter_enable=YES
ipmon_enable=YES
ipmon_flags=-Dsvn
ipnat_enable=YES
ipfs_enable=YES
I added a rule file /etc/ipf.conf , and flushed/reloaded ipf with the
ipf runs as a kernel module or compiled into the kernel you will never see
it running as a normal program you will know it is running by testing your
firewall to make sure it does what it was meant to do
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD
6.0-RELEASE
Gable Barber wrote:
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
.
I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
ipfilter_enable=YES
ipmon_enable=YES
ipmon_flags=-Dsvn
ipnat_enable=YES
ipfs_enable=YES
I added a rule file /etc/ipf.conf , and
--- Gable Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy List...
I am trying to figure out if ipf is running for certain. FreeBSD
6.0-RELEASE
.
I added the following to /etc/rc.conf :
ipfilter_enable=YES
ipmon_enable=YES
ipmon_flags=-Dsvn
ipnat_enable=YES
ipfs_enable=YES
I added a
Yes, incorrectly, if you have any rules with the log key word, then you
can se if you get any entries in your log files. I would have default
rules first in my rule set:
block log in all
block log out all
And then pass what I positively know is good.
Cheers, Erik
It seems
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
opinions.
Gable
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
--- Gable Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
All I can say is that I remember using ipf when I was on OpenBSD 2.9. At
3.0 it went to pf and ever since then I've been extremely pleased
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was some bug in IPF for 5.x some version
that forced me to
On 1/18/06, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there
--- Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gable Barber wrote:
On 1/18/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switch over to pf.
Why do you suggest PF over IPF?
Hope I am not starting a war here.. but I am genuinely interested in
the
opinions.
I used IPF on FBSD until there was
15 matches
Mail list logo