Re: IPNAT seems to affect network performance? of jails on lo0 (10.0.0.0/24) - why?

2012-07-04 Thread Kalle Møller
I know that ssh does a reverse dns lookup of the ip you connect from - no matter if its local or not. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de wrote: On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:23:56 -0400 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Christopher J. Ruwe writes: On a KVM

Re: IPNAT seems to affect network performance? of jails on lo0 (10.0.0.0/24) - why?

2012-06-26 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:23:56 -0400 Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Christopher J. Ruwe writes: On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on 10.0.0.0. While by the large working as expected,

IPNAT seems to affect network performance? of jails on lo0 (10.0.0.0/24) - why?

2012-06-25 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on 10.0.0.0. While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one pecularity I have failed to pinpoint: When launching processes with some network interaction, like

IPNAT seems to affect network performance? of jails on lo0 (10.0.0.0/24) - why?

2012-06-25 Thread Robert Huff
Christopher J. Ruwe writes: On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on 10.0.0.0. While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one pecularity I have failed to pinpoint: When launching