Eric Schuele wrote:
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi All,
Now I am really confused.
Up until this morning I thought I had a good handle on when I need to
use the real Netmask and Broadcast.
For example, If I have 3 servers, and my upline asigns me a block of
128 addresses, for the first ip used (from
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi All,
Now I am really confused.
Up until this morning I thought I had a good handle on when I need to
use the real Netmask and Broadcast.
For example, If I have 3 servers, and my upline asigns me a block of 128
addresses, for the first ip used (from this block) on each s
255.255.0"
> >> >> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 1.1.1.6 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> >> >> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet 1.1.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> >> >> ...
> >> >> ifconfig_em0_alias2="inet 2.2.2.6 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> >> >> i
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:31:20AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> > Anyway, all the aliases for any one NIC card must be 255.255.255.255.
>
> Not so. All aliases for any one NIC on the same network must be
> 0x. If you have an alias which is on another network, then the
> first al
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:31:20AM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> Anyway, all the aliases for any one NIC card must be 255.255.255.255.
Not so. All aliases for any one NIC on the same network must be
0x. If you have an alias which is on another network, then the
first alias on that net
Jerry McAllister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "John Oxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: IPs , Netmasks and Broadcast.
Jerry,
I apologise. Its late in the day for me and the email addresses are
b
I am referencing.
- Original Message - From: "Jerry McAllister"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Oxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: IPs , Netmasks and Broadcast.
Thanks John,
What
> From: "Jerry McAllister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "John Oxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:56 AM
> Subject: Re: IPs , Netmasks and Broadcast.
>
>
> >>
> >> Th
ncing.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry McAllister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Oxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: IPs , Netmasks and Broadcast.
Thanks John,
What you are saying make
...
>
> Server 3, 4 and 5 similar with repeating patterns.
>
> So the original question was: When setting up an IP from any given block,
> do, or should I, need to use the real netmask that my ISP has assinged me
> (for the first), then, the single host (255) netmask for each of the
sk for each of the rest
(Again, from a specific IP block?
I hope it is because I have hundreds of IPs set up that way.
The reason I ask this question (again) is because I have one IP that does
not want to work using the above paradigm. That is to say, that it IS the
only IP from a specific bl
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Grant Peel wrote:
> Now I am really confused.
First of all install ipcalc NOW.
> Up until this morning I thought I had a good handle on when I need to use
> the real Netmask and Broadcast.
>
> For example, If I have 3 servers, and my upline asigns me a b
>
> Hi All,
>
> Now I am really confused.
>
> Up until this morning I thought I had a good handle on when I need to use
> the real Netmask and Broadcast.
>
> For example, If I have 3 servers, and my upline asigns me a block of 128
> addresses, for the first ip used (from this block) on each s
Hi All,
Now I am really confused.
Up until this morning I thought I had a good handle on when I need to use
the real Netmask and Broadcast.
For example, If I have 3 servers, and my upline asigns me a block of 128
addresses, for the first ip used (from this block) on each server, I would
nee
14 matches
Mail list logo
