On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 04:35, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
> This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
> machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
> isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
> would affect such a backup soluti
| Before certain events in New York, we used to talk about
"hypothetical
| jumbo jets" when considering our disaster plans. Secure off-site
| backups are a necessity. Take care thought that the off-site
location
| really is secure. I did hear that some of the businesses in the
World
| Trade
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
> This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
> machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
> isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
> would affect such a
This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
would affect such a backup solution.
However, I could use a push in the right direction when
