ke han wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most
apps. The
yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than
FreeBSD/i386 on athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled
for P4. With
Generally speaking, mail and file server are not RAM intensive. A 32
proc can directly address 4GB RAM (2**32). FreeBSD allows you to
address more than 4GB on a 32 bit proc but limited to 4GB max per
process. The actual per process limit will be a bit less, I think.
A 64 bit proc can
32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most apps. The
yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than FreeBSD/i386 on
athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled for P4. With default
FreeBSD/i386 - it will be at least 30%.
just because it's not just
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most
apps. The
yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than FreeBSD/
i386 on athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled for P4.
With default
I hope that I'm not starting some sort of holy war with this question,
but here I'll go.
I'm planning to set-up some e-mail / file servers running FreeBSD 6.1 in
the near future and I'm wondering if it will be worth the cost to use 64
but CPU's for this.
Also I would like to know which
