On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, John wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:34:10PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 294, Issue 12, Message 19
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:35:21 -0600 John wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > > OK! Well! Good news! After a sort.
> > > > >
> > > > > I
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 05:34:10PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 294, Issue 12, Message 19
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:35:21 -0600 John wrote:
> [..]
> > > > OK! Well! Good news! After a sort.
> > > >
> > > > I switched to BootMgr, and it came right up with 8.0!
>
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 294, Issue 12, Message 19
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:35:21 -0600 John wrote:
[..]
> > > OK! Well! Good news! After a sort.
> > >
> > > I switched to BootMgr, and it came right up with 8.0!
> > >
> > > Slight downside - extra prompt during boot, and of course,
John wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:35:21PM -0600, John wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:01:02AM -0600, John wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:09:50AM -0600, John wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:27:56AM -0600, John wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:36:14AM -0600, John wrote:
On Fri, Ja
> OK - my current best theory is that if the Standard boot manager
> is faced with anything other than exactly 1 bootable slice (partition
> to it), it defaults to "Invalid partition table." I'll bet anyone
> lunch that this is true. Any takers?
I've read before:
the standard bootloader lo
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:35:21PM -0600, John wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:01:02AM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:09:50AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:27:56AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:36:14AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > > >
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:01:02AM -0600, John wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:09:50AM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:27:56AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:36:14AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:16:59PM +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:09:50AM -0600, John wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:27:56AM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:36:14AM -0600, John wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:16:59PM +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> > > > John wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:25:26PM +0800
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:27:56AM -0600, John wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:36:14AM -0600, John wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:16:59PM +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> > > John wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:25:26PM +0800, Fbsd1 wrote:
> > > >> John wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 20