Jason Morgan wrote:
On 2008.07.07 12:16:44, David Allen wrote:
# grep fxp0 /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00
ifconfig_fxp0_alias0=10.0.1.3 netmask 0x
ifconfig_fxp0_alias1=10.0.1.4 netmask 0x
ifconfig_fxp0_alias2=10.0.1.5 netmask 0x
My
Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.07.2008 21:01
To
FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
Hello,
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd like to think. If it doesn't,
then the scenario is
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Hi,
I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
adrresses for the jails.
It should be:
inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Hi,
I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
adrresses for the jails.
It should be:
inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you take the necessary steps to restrict the IP addresses on which
sendmail on the host and the jail listen? The jail man page only
says:
I don't think anyone would get too far with jails in general if the
jail host
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or
David Allen wrote:
There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly. There's a
possibility that may help in this case, but that layer of added
Hello,
* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
to use it for loopback style things.
* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
NAT and redirect within
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello,
* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
to use it for loopback style things.
* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
NAT and
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:24:33 Mel wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd like to
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Allen wrote:
There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly.
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for clarity and
brevity.
-
# hostname
jailhost.example.org
# host jailhost
jailhost.example.org has
Hello,
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for clarity and
brevity.
-
# hostname
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jason Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for clarity and
brevity.
On 2008.07.07 12:16:44, David Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jason Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for
Did you take the necessary steps to restrict the IP addresses on which
sendmail on the host and the jail listen? The jail man page only
says:
To configure sendmail(8), it is necessary to modify
/etc/mail/sendmail.cf.
but you'll probably end up adjusting the DAEMON_OPTIONS lines of
17 matches
Mail list logo
