On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Uuencoding works fine...
>
> yup, that's what I thought. And it works fine indeed. However, I was
> thinking into more of a MIME or multi-part message, much like a regular
> attachment. That's not really essential, however. Thi
+-- Carlos A. Carnero Delgado [freebsd] [15-10-03 13:35 IST]:
| Hello,
|
| > Uuencoding works fine...
|
| yup, that's what I thought. And it works fine indeed. However, I was
| thinking into more of a MIME or multi-part message, much like a regular
| attachment. That's not really essential, howev
In the last episode (Oct 15), Carlos A. Carnero Delgado said:
> > Uuencoding works fine...
>
> yup, that's what I thought. And it works fine indeed. However, I was
> thinking into more of a MIME or multi-part message, much like a
> regular attachment. That's not really essential, however. This jus
Hello,
> Uuencoding works fine...
yup, that's what I thought. And it works fine indeed. However, I was
thinking into more of a MIME or multi-part message, much like a regular
attachment. That's not really essential, however. This just works.
Thanks a lot,
Carlos.
___
On 2003-10-14 23:52, "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to mail some users binary files (.tar.gz) from cron jobs. What's
> the best way to do that? Maybe uuencoding them? (bonus points if no
> ports involved ;)
Uuencoding works fine. Try running this:
Hello,
I need to mail some users binary files (.tar.gz) from cron jobs. What's
the best way to do that? Maybe uuencoding them? (bonus points if no
ports involved ;)
Thanks,
Carlos.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li