Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-02-02 Thread Jacques Beigbeder
>> > On a same Ethernet 100 LAN, I have several Unix and >> > an NFS Solaris fileserver. On these Unix, I tried: >> >time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 >> > On each try, I use new files, to avoid the impact of file caching. >> > >> > I measured the time spent and the n

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Saturday 31 January 2004 19:03, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:11, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > On Saturday 31 January 2004 16:02, Jacques Beigbeder wrote: > > > time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 > > > > > > > > > NFS clienttime

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Sunday 01 February 2004 00:26, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 19:03, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:11, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > > Did you read the notes in src/UPDATING saying: > > > NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW: > > > >

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Saturday 31 January 2004 19:03, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:11, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > Did you read the notes in src/UPDATING saying: > > NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW: > > Could you pleas explain that numbers? No, because you also failed

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:11, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 16:02, Jacques Beigbeder wrote: > > time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 > > > > > > NFS client time# pkts > > === === == > > Solaris

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 04:02:21PM +0100, Jacques Beigbeder wrote: > On a same Ethernet 100 LAN, I have several Unix and > an NFS Solaris fileserver. On these Unix, I tried: > time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 > On each try, I use new files, to avoid the impact of fi

Re: NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Saturday 31 January 2004 16:02, Jacques Beigbeder wrote: > time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 > > NFS clienttime# pkts > === === == > Solaris 3.11s 2296 > Linux Redhat9 2.42s 1929 > Fre

NFS performances on 5.1

2004-01-31 Thread Jacques Beigbeder
On a same Ethernet 100 LAN, I have several Unix and an NFS Solaris fileserver. On these Unix, I tried: time dd=/fileserver/aFile of=/fileserver/otherFile bs=32768 On each try, I use new files, to avoid the impact of file caching. I measured the time spent and the number of Ethernet packets