Re: NIC bonding/teaming

2006-01-13 Thread Ian Lord
At 17:14 2006-01-13, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jan 13), Ian Lord said: > At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: > >On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > >>Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux > >>bond (rnd robin,

Re: NIC bonding/teaming

2006-01-13 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 13), Ian Lord said: > At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: > >On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > >>Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux > >>bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm

Re: NIC bonding/teaming

2006-01-13 Thread Ian Lord
At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP an

Re: NIC bonding/teaming

2006-01-13 Thread Ceri Davies
On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and one2many, but they don't seem

NIC bonding/teaming

2006-01-13 Thread jim feldman
Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does