Re: Options for redundant storage cluster?

2010-02-19 Thread Daniel Gerzo
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:40:19 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi For the illiterati, like myself, _what_ does committed to head mean? head is a synonym for -CURRENT. You can read more about this topic in our great handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html

Options for redundant storage cluster?

2010-02-18 Thread Matthew Law
Hi, hopefully I'm not too far out posting this question here. It takes in a lot of areas so I was unsure where to post it. If it belongs on another ML please advise and I will re-post it there. I am researching options for a two node failover storage cluster. This is primarily to provide

Re: Options for redundant storage cluster?

2010-02-18 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Matthew Law m...@webcontracts.co.ukwrote: Hi, hopefully I'm not too far out posting this question here. It takes in a lot of areas so I was unsure where to post it. If it belongs on another ML please advise and I will re-post it there. I am researching

Re: Options for redundant storage cluster?

2010-02-18 Thread Daniel Gerzo
On 19.2.2010 2:30, Adam Vande More wrote: I'd say right now ggated/ggatec + heartbeat is sort of roughly equivalent of DRBD and heartbeat. I think many of us are waiting for HAST though. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2009-October/001279.html FYI, HAST was committed