On Monday 04 May 2009 02:07:41 nf wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Frederique Rijsdijk
>
> wrote:
> > nf wrote:
> >> 733843456 bytes transferred in 61.124812 secs (12005656 bytes/sec)
> >
> > That is very low. I get about 60MB/sec in this way. Adding bs=1m it'll go
> > up to 240MB/sec even
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Frederique Rijsdijk
wrote:
> nf wrote:
>>
>> 733843456 bytes transferred in 61.124812 secs (12005656 bytes/sec)
>
> That is very low. I get about 60MB/sec in this way. Adding bs=1m it'll go up
> to 240MB/sec even (raidz1 with 4*1TB).
>
> Could you show top -S ?
I w
nf wrote:
733843456 bytes transferred in 61.124812 secs (12005656 bytes/sec)
That is very low. I get about 60MB/sec in this way. Adding bs=1m it'll
go up to 240MB/sec even (raidz1 with 4*1TB).
CPU: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 14.3% system, 4.5% interrupt, 80.8% idle
Mem: 1950M Active, 868M Ina
Hello!
I've got a ZFS-based file server running FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE, with two
raidz1's of 3 x 500gb.
Recently my system has exhibited exceptionally poor performance in a
way that confuses me. None of the drives are in a degraded state, and
zpool iostat reports typical performance figures, while ac
