What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from 'db' (databases/db2) to 'db2' (databases/db2).
** No need to upgrade 'db-2.7.7_1' (= db2-2.7.7_1). (specify -f to
On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:20 am, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321
packages found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from 'db' (databases/db2) to 'db2'
(databases/db2). ** No need to
On Saturday 06 March 2004 11:12 am, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 09:20 am, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321
packages found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:20:53AM -0600, Chris wrote:
What would be the best way to handle this in portupgrade?
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 321 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
** Package name changed from 'db' (databases/db2) to 'db2' (databases/db2).
** No
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:30:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That's not an error, so there's nothing to handle :-) If you want to
remove the warning then rebuild the db port with the -f flag to force
the rebuild.
Kris
Hi! I have the same messages, but pkgdb -f or pkgdb -fu don't remove
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:10:41AM +0100, Manuel Hernandez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:30:49PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
That's not an error, so there's nothing to handle :-) If you want to
remove the warning then rebuild the db port with the -f flag to force
the rebuild.
