-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 10:30 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
In all the time of asking for various help and providing
You were lucky, the usual results of being vague with questions are not
generally productive.
It is also polite to thank the poster to the list who actually made the
suggestion that helped you to fix the problem, as well as to let him and
the list know that it did in fact, work.
It is a
On Sunday, 26. June 2005 01:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If there was significant product differentiation between xfree86 and
xorg, then there would be a reason to keep both. Right now there is
not and with the difficulty in X development, there won't soon be.
There's already quite a delta on
Warren wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
After this command that seems to skip ports that fail, what version of
imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries do you have installed?
Dejan
What ever is the latest version as i did a CVSUP and portupgrade as of 24 June
2005 and the above port is the only one that failed.
--
Yours Sincerely
Shinjii
On Saturday 25 of June 2005 15:10, Warren wrote:
After this command that seems to skip ports that fail, what version of
imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries do you have installed?
Dejan
What ever is the latest version as i did a CVSUP and portupgrade as of 24
June 2005 and the above port
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:17 AM
To: Daniel O'Connor
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
just FreeBSD 4.11
I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Linimon
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 7:45 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community
isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of
open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development
between 2 forks of X Windows. The
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir $(XF86OSSRC)/shared/drm/kernel
#endif
If it does not, you should (re)install devel/imake-4 port.
I actually
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
***
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 00:44, Warren wrote:
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir $(XF86OSSRC)/shared/drm/kernel
#endif
If it does not,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Linimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Mark Linimon; Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sat, Jun 25
: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on
FreeBSD 5
I use XFree86 as it was what i was using when i upgraded the machine from 4.x
to use 5.x and i personally prefer it, nothing more nothing less and untill
such time as Xfree86 is no longer maintained willi entertain the idea of
moving to Xorg.
Now may i please be removed from your CC's .. i
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Lesjak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:19 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mark Linimon; Warren
Subject: RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 01:18, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
On Sunday 26 of June 2005 00:44, Warren wrote:
You can check with pkg_info(1). You should have imake-4.5.0. The
file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/X11.tmpl should include the following:
#ifndef DRMIncludesDir
#define DRMIncludesDir
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:26 PM
To: Dejan Lesjak
Cc: Mark Linimon; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
I use XFree86 as it was what i was using when i upgraded the
machine from 4.x
to use 5.x and i
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If you had mentioned in the beginning that this system was upgraded
from 4 you would have never spawned this discussion. Since you don't
like the discussion perhaps that is a lesson to you to make more
complete questions, no?
Ted
If
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 4:35 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Dejan Lesjak; Ted Mittelstaedt; Mark Linimon
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 9:33 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If you had mentioned in the beginning that this system was upgraded
from 4 you would have never spawned this discussion. Since you don't
like the discussion perhaps that is a lesson to you to make more
complete questions, no?
Ted
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c
xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c
xf86drmSL.c
make: don't know how to
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:47, Warren wrote:
Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
cant say as i did.
Well that was silly..
Not that I think there is a specific entry in this case but it is a good habit
to get in to..
Do you have the
26 matches
Mail list logo
