On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:22:56 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> Oops, I didn't read the question accurately. This might be more
> useful:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html
Oops, and I answered too fast: YYes, that's the kind of list
I was searching for. Now it
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 10:32:24 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
> >> I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
> >
> > Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
> >
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
/u
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
___
On 6/18/2011 9:38 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
omitted without
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100, Frank Shute wrote:
> I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.
Is there a list that states which CPU should be used with
(at least) which CPUTYPE setting?
Meanwhile, the build process stopped after nearly 2 hours
with the following error:
cc
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 04:38:39AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > > Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> > > CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> > CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
> > omitted without problems?
> >
>
> I've use
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
> omitted without problems?
>
I've used core successfully for years. Did you clean any potential
conflicts? Wha
This happened with CPUTYPE=core after 11 minutes:
--
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries
--
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=amd64 MACHINE=amd64 CPUT
YPE=cor
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:26:25 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> Here's a guess, I seem to remember another with a similar situation. The
> core2 support is rather new, as in very new. The current compiler on your
> system doesn't support it, although one build from sources should. If IIRC,
> the or
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> In the example make.conf, the following section can be found:
>
> # Currently the following CPU types are recognized:
> # Intel x86 architecture:
> # (AMD CPUs) opteron athlon64 athlon-mp athlon-xp athlon-4
> #
I am currently installing FreeBSD on my new (haha) home
desktop system that's waiting for some years now for this
event. The system is a quite cheap home PC from a discounter
that has the following CPU:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4300
@1.80GHz (1799.81-MHz K8-class CPU)
Some time
13 matches
Mail list logo
