Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:38:41 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > portupgrade -rfx '>=2004-01-15' foo > > will force re-install 'foo' and everything that depends on package > 'foo', except those packages installed on or after the given date. Well, actually I want -R and not -r, but anyways.. almos

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:25:17PM -0500, Scott I. Remick wrote: > One question: it's not clear from man pkg_glob whether I can combine the > date format '<2004-01-15' with a package name, so that I only update the > dependencies of a SPECIFIC package that are older than that date (using -f > inste

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:12:27 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Work out what went wrong, fix it and then just run: > > # portupgrade -af '<2004-01-15' > > which does a forced update of all packages installed before the given > date. (Note: -R and -r are unnecessary with -a). Rinse, > repeat.

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:03:31AM -0500, Scott I. Remick wrote: > So... my ultimate question is: how do you pros handle situations like this? > Is there a trick I'm missing? Work out what went wrong, fix it and then just run: # portupgrade -af '<2004-01-15' which does a forced update of a

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:02:44 + (GMT), Jan Grant wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Scott I. Remick wrote: > >> So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the >> instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went >> fine, no probs. >> >> I noticed some of my

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Scott I. Remick wrote: > So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the > instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went > fine, no probs. > > I noticed some of my daemons (from ports) seemed a bit annoyed though upon > booting up 5

Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went fine, no probs. I noticed some of my daemons (from ports) seemed a bit annoyed though upon booting up 5.2. I tried using portupgrade -Rf on them individuall