On 2004-12-31 21:20, Michael Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have most of my interactive shell experience using bash on Linux and
> shell programing on Unix-like systems with Bourne shell. Since
> FreeBSD's default shell is csh/tcsh, I was wondering if it's still
> considered an atrocity to
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:20:22 -0600
Michael Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have most of my interactive shell experience using bash on Linux
> and shell programing on Unix-like systems with Bourne shell. Since
> FreeBSD's default shell is csh/tcsh, I was wondering if it's still
> considered
Michael Madden wrote:
[ ... ]
Are most FreeBSD users still using csh or tcsh has their interactive
shell and sh for programming? I think it would be nice to use the same
interactive and programming shell for consistency.
Most FreeBSD shell scripts seem to be written for /bin/sh. Many FreeBSD use
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 09:20:22PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
>
> Are most FreeBSD users still using csh or tcsh has their interactive
> shell and sh for programming? I think it would be nice to use the
> same interactive and programming shel
I have most of my interactive shell experience using bash on Linux and shell
programing on Unix-like systems with Bourne shell. Since FreeBSD's default
shell is csh/tcsh, I was wondering if it's still considered an atrocity to
develop shell scripts with C shell:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-f
