RE: Gnome port

2006-02-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On Friday I came across a gimp script-fu which would slice an image into pieces and output html that rendered the

Re: Gnome port

2006-02-05 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 02:54:07PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On [snip] Let me be more clear because I'm

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote: Greetings, I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and installs www/gnome-user-share. *That* port forces the www/apache20 port upon me.

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Wes Santee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael C. Shultz wrote: | On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote: | |Greetings, | |I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via |the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 15 December 2005 11:45, Wes Santee wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: | On Thursday 15 December 2005 10:32, Wes Santee wrote: |Greetings, | |I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via |the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and