Re: Problems with portupgrade libreoffice

2012-06-10 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:46:49 +, Walter Hurry wrote: On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:12:25 +0100, Dave Morgan wrote: On 09/06/12 at 04:41P, Walter Hurry wrote: FreeBSD 9 on x86_64. I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4 to 3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so

Re: Problems with portupgrade libreoffice

2012-06-09 Thread Dave Morgan
On 09/06/12 at 04:41P, Walter Hurry wrote: FreeBSD 9 on x86_64. I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4 to 3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so far) errored out 4 times, in the following modules: vcl framework sfx2 tail_build Each time, it told me to go

Re: Problems with portupgrade libreoffice

2012-06-09 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:12:25 +0100, Dave Morgan wrote: On 09/06/12 at 04:41P, Walter Hurry wrote: FreeBSD 9 on x86_64. I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4 to 3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so far) errored out 4 times, in the following modules: vcl

Re: Problems with portupgrade or db

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:35:55 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Range Not Satisfiable errors are because your db-4.2.52.tar.gz is of an incorrect size (probably larger than what's on the source site). The last error (talking about modification time) could indicate that you

Re: Problems with portupgrade or db

2008-10-14 Thread mdh
--- On Tue, 10/14/08, Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems with portupgrade or db To: FreeBSD-Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 8:08 AM Hi, In an attempt to upgrade db42 to db47 I seem to have broken

Re: Problems with portupgrade or db

2008-10-14 Thread Jerry
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:18:36 +0200 Marco Beishuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The package is already present in /usr/ports/distfiles/bdb and when I download it manually I get the error above. No guarantee that this will work; however, at this point you have nothing to lose. 1) Empty the

Re: Problems with portupgrade or db

2008-10-14 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:18:36PM +0200, Marco Beishuizen wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT) mdh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried installing db42 from ports manually? ie: (cd /usr/ports/databases/db42 make deinstall make clean make install make clean) If

Re: Problems with portupgrade or db

2008-10-14 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT) mdh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried installing db42 from ports manually? ie: (cd /usr/ports/databases/db42 make deinstall make clean make install make clean) If that doesn't work, perhaps try installing the db42 pkg from the FreeBSD ftp

Re: problems with portupgrade -a

2006-06-23 Thread Andrey Slusar
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:16:34 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: I'm wondering what this means... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -a [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb1_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 82 packages found (-0 +55) ... done] ** Package

RE: Problems with portupgrade

2004-11-03 Thread Ralph M. Los
-Original Message- From: Ralph M. Los Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems with portupgrade Hi, When I try to do a portupgrade -var I get some of these errors, and I'm not sure how to resolve them: --- Session started at: Mon, 01

Re: Problems with portupgrade

2004-11-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Ralph M. Los wrote: OK, so what I did was followed the UPDATING file's advice, and did the customary: pkg_delete -f /var/db/pkg/imake-4* /var/db/pkg/XFree86-* cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg make install pkgdb -F But I STILL get this after the

Re: Problems with portupgrade

2004-11-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:05:59AM -0500, Ralph M. Los wrote: What am I doing wrong? Better yet, what am I doing!? Thanks in advance for the help. You forgot to read /usr/ports/UPDATING :-) Kris pgpN22QUHc3cc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Scott I. Remick wrote: So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went fine, no probs. I noticed some of my daemons (from ports) seemed a bit annoyed though upon booting up 5.2. I

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:02:44 + (GMT), Jan Grant wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Scott I. Remick wrote: So I'm upgrading my 5.1R desktop to 5.2R. Used cvsup, followed the instructions in UPGRADING, did a custom kernel, etc etc. That part went fine, no probs. I noticed some of my daemons

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:03:31AM -0500, Scott I. Remick wrote: So... my ultimate question is: how do you pros handle situations like this? Is there a trick I'm missing? Work out what went wrong, fix it and then just run: # portupgrade -af '2004-01-15' which does a forced update of all

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:12:27 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: Work out what went wrong, fix it and then just run: # portupgrade -af '2004-01-15' which does a forced update of all packages installed before the given date. (Note: -R and -r are unnecessary with -a). Rinse, repeat. Until

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:25:17PM -0500, Scott I. Remick wrote: One question: it's not clear from man pkg_glob whether I can combine the date format '2004-01-15' with a package name, so that I only update the dependencies of a SPECIFIC package that are older than that date (using -f instead

Re: Problems using portupgrade to recompile all ports

2004-01-15 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:38:41 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: portupgrade -rfx '=2004-01-15' foo will force re-install 'foo' and everything that depends on package 'foo', except those packages installed on or after the given date. Well, actually I want -R and not -r, but anyways.. almost,