RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-18 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Bertrand Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 4:52 PM To: 'David Kirchner' Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Release engineering confusion -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:16:31PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup. I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT, in my supfile, I should have the following to do so: *default

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I'm a little confused about which tags to use in my supfiles for cvsup. I've installed 6.0-RELEASE, and really want to stay with STABLE. AFAICT, in my supfile, I should have the following to do so: *default tag=RELENG_6_0 ...is that

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:33 PM To: Steve Bertrand Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I'm a little confused

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: J.D. Bronson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:33 PM To: Steve Bertrand Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion At 05:16 PM 11/16/2005, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I'm a little confused

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread RW
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:38, Steve Bertrand wrote: In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE?

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you.

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: Dan O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:31 PM To: Steve Bertrand Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook pretty much clarifies

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. However, that entire page out of the

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you.

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/16/05, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook pretty much clarifies that a production environment should *not* track either STABLE or CURRENT. So I'm assuming I'm best off with RELENG_6_0 etc, etc? Does anyone here actually run

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Kirchner Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 7:45 PM To: Steve Bertrand Cc: RW; FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Release engineering confusion On 11/16/05, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
In production (at an ISP), what is the best to follow...RELENGX_X or RELENG_X? I have 4.x, 5.x boxes in production, and this 6.x box is being prepared for the same. See the Handbook: 20.2.2.2 Who Needs FreeBSD-STABLE? Thank you. However, that entire page out of the handbook

Re: Release engineering confusion

2005-11-16 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/16/05, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Kirchner D'oh. I had no idea my From header looked like that. Another gmail frustration. I do only have a handful of servers, however