On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 06:32:53PM +0300, Toni Heinonen wrote:
>>On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:50:53 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>>>At 08:28 PM 3.27.2004 +0100, Cordula's Web wrote:
>Within the past couple of weeks, the Apache logs have shown a new
>type of intrusion -- a very, very long URL reque
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GROG! (Jeff Howie)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Very long URL with malice intended
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar 200
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:50:53 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> >At 08:28 PM 3.27.2004 +0100, Cordula's Web wrote:
> >>>Within the past couple of weeks, the Apache logs have shown a new
> >>>type of intrusion -- a very, very long URL request...
> >>>
> >>>My question is what syntax can I add, if any,
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:50:53 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>At 08:28 PM 3.27.2004 +0100, Cordula's Web wrote:
>>>Within the past couple of weeks, the Apache logs have shown a new
>>>type of intrusion -- a very, very long URL request...
>>>
>>>My question is what syntax can I add, if any, to my httpd.
At 08:28 PM 3.27.2004 +0100, Cordula's Web wrote:
>> Within the past couple of weeks, the Apache logs have shown a new type of
>> intrusion -- a very, very long URL request -- that finally receives a error
>> 414. I don't know the purpose of this one, but doesn't appear
>> well-intended. It comes l
> Within the past couple of weeks, the Apache logs have shown a new type of
> intrusion -- a very, very long URL request -- that finally receives a error
> 414. I don't know the purpose of this one, but doesn't appear
> well-intended. It comes late at night and from different IPs. One request
> eve