On Oct 18, 2004, at 2:26 PM, stheg olloydson wrote:
--- Bart [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, it would be connectivity + bandwidth + geography.
Some of the buildings are close together...close enough that you can
lean on the wall of one and throw a softball to hit the other.
Others are over 20
--- Bart [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, it would be connectivity + bandwidth + geography.
>
>Some of the buildings are close together...close enough that you can
>lean on the wall of one and throw a softball to hit the other.
>
>Others are over 20 miles apart, and it's not really 3 build
On Oct 18, 2004, at 12:37 PM, stheg olloydson wrote:
What you have here is a hardware, not software, problem. The root cause
is the unreliable connectivity between buildings. To ensure all network
resources are always available, use redundant fiber-optic connections
and set your routing such that y
> -Original Message-
> From: stheg olloydson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: feasible w/ samba?
>
>
> it was said:
>
> >What this would essentially be
it was said:
>What this would essentially be attempting to achieve is to have a way
>for a geographically spread out network allow people to easily access
>their home directories and shares no matter where they logged using
>local servers acting as time-delayed proxies...all the user login
>in
