> > Are you talking about PF or IPF in 4.9? If it's IPF, it's a kernel
> > option.
>
> PF. I already have IPF working. I am more familiar with PF and would
> rather be using it.
>
> Thanks
>
Ah. Ok. Misunderstood.
--
Micheal Patterson
TSG Network Administration
405-917-0600
Confidentiali
On Dec 31, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Micheal Patterson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Will Prater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
- Original Message -
From: "Will Prater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
>
> On Dec 31, 2003, at 5:12 AM, fbsd_user wrote:
>
&
isted in: ipv6
Description : Sources : Package : Changes : Download
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/index.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will Prater
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 2:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipf / pf avai
59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipf / pf availability in 4.9
List,
Anyone know if there is a way to get PF to port to FreeBSD 4.9?
Thanks
On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:26 PM, fbsd_user wrote:
> PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a
> common code backg
List,
Anyone know if there is a way to get PF to port to FreeBSD 4.9?
Thanks
On Dec 30, 2003, at 7:26 PM, fbsd_user wrote:
PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a
common code background, but I do know pf & ipf have totally
different rule processing logic though the rule
Thanks for the reply ... I did a bit more reading about it, and found
that ipf used to be in openbsd, until some sort of license dispute.
Then the openbsd people supposedly wrote their own pf ... so there's
probably no relation between the two...
as for the scripting .. i'll probably have to l
PF has been just ported to FBSD. I don't know if ipf & pf have a
common code background, but I do know pf & ipf have totally
different rule processing logic though the rules do look some what
common. When it comes to using variables on the rule set, that is
just the normal function of shell process
