RE: sshd / tcp packet corruption ? ZFS Samba?

2010-06-28 Thread Martin Minkus
than flaky hardware. Thanks for your help to those who took the time to reply. Martin. From: Martin Minkus Sent: Monday, 28 June 2010 09:22 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: sshd / tcp packet corruption ? ZFS Samba? Hey all, It was suggested I do a memtest

RE: sshd / tcp packet corruption ? ZFS Samba?

2010-06-27 Thread Martin Minkus
Hey all, It was suggested I do a memtest, but that checked out fine. (I wish it was as simple as just the ram!) I’ve realised the issue manifests itself almost immediately when accessing an underlying ZFS filesystem using Samba. But if it is UFS, it is fine. Does this mean anything to

Re: sshd / tcp packet corruption ?

2010-06-23 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Martin Minkus martin.min...@punz.co.nz writes: It seems this issue I reported below may actually be related to some kind of TCP packet corruption ? Possible. Or memory errors. Hard to say much at this point, when you don't even know which side is actually causing the errors. Still same

RE: sshd / tcp packet corruption ?

2010-06-23 Thread Martin Minkus
point. I'll do a memtest. Martin. -Original Message- From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org] Sent: Thursday, 24 June 2010 09:41 To: Martin Minkus Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: sshd / tcp packet corruption ? Martin Minkus martin.min...@punz.co.nz writes

RE: sshd / tcp packet corruption ?

2010-06-22 Thread Martin Minkus
So definitely some kind of packet corruption; Using netcat to send a single megabyte of binary data to a box with no known issues (from kinetic - steel): kinetic:/tmp$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=random.testfile bs=1k count=1k 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1048576 bytes transferred in