On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:36:12 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> Welcome to the glory of rapid application development and
> "modern" programming! :-)
Somebody could write a letter to the ACM: "Dynamic Linking Considered
Harmful" ... or sth in that vicinity
--
Christopher J. Ruwe
TZ GMT + 1
signature.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:03:02 -0800, Chip Camden
wrote:
Gutenprint support is an OPTION in gimp -- perhaps turning that off
relieves you of the dependency?
Or maybe it's an option to gnomevfs... or something
related to Gtk 2 in general...
It's not guten
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:03:02 -0800, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Gutenprint support is an OPTION in gimp -- perhaps turning that off
> relieves you of the dependency?
Or maybe it's an option to gnomevfs... or something
related to Gtk 2 in general...
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user
Quoth Warren Block on Wednesday, 05 January 2011:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> >Can someone enlighten me as to why the GIMP package would require
> >libsmbclient? This strikes me as the very height of software bloat
> >absurdity. Maybe I'm missing something.
>
> package = pre-bu
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Chad Perrin wrote:
Can someone enlighten me as to why the GIMP package would require
libsmbclient? This strikes me as the very height of software bloat
absurdity. Maybe I'm missing something.
package = pre-built, off-the-rack, one-size-fits-all.
I don't know where the de
There's prolly a 10 line function the developer didn't want to write. I've seen
some case where it takes more code to link to other packages than just write
what's needed. Drives me crazy to have to install apps that have "nothing" to
do with the app I really need...
-Original Message-
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:19:39 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Can someone enlighten me as to why the GIMP package would require
> libsmbclient? This strikes me as the very height of software bloat
> absurdity. Maybe I'm missing something.
Welcome to the glory of rapid application development and
"mod
