Re: REALLY frustrated with ports problem

2004-03-05 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
Thanks, guys, it was the optimization settings. I was trying the ones I found on the bsd-tuning page, and thought -O3 was okay for non-kernel. You just helped a MAJOR headache go away. ;-) NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows

Re: REALLY frustrated with ports problem

2004-03-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:01:36PM +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: Thanks, guys, it was the optimization settings. I was trying the ones I found on the bsd-tuning page, and thought -O3 was okay for non-kernel. Please be sure to tell whoever wrote the bsd-tuning page that they're giving out

REALLY frustrated with ports problem

2004-03-04 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
What do I have to do to resolve this ports/pthread problem? I am having this problem with MANY ports recently. I don't have it on my 4.8 box, but 4.9-stable is turning into a nightmare. cc -Wall -O3 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math -march=pentiumpro -I. -I. -I/usr /local/include/tk8.4

Re: REALLY frustrated with ports problem

2004-03-04 Thread Khairil Yusof
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 01:10 +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: What do I have to do to resolve this ports/pthread problem? cc -Wall -O3 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math -march=pentiumpro Lower your optimization settings and get rid of the -ffoo optimisations? make.conf states you should use -O

Re: REALLY frustrated with ports problem

2004-03-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:10:46AM +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: What do I have to do to resolve this ports/pthread problem? I am having this problem with MANY ports recently. I don't have it on my 4.8 box, but 4.9-stable is turning into a nightmare. cc -Wall -O3 -pipe -funroll-loops