Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

Nicole Harrington wrote: --- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicole Harrington wri tes: --- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

--- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicole Harrington wri tes: --- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out of

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:22:26PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: Andrew Hammond wrote: On 2/7/07, Nicole Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246 Opteron cpu's) Now of course

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out of threads. However, if there's some shared resource that is the bottleneck for your load, and the resource doesn't support simultaneous access by all the cores, more cores

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out of threads. However, if there's some shared resource that is the bottleneck for your load, and the resource

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

--- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out of threads. However, if there's some shared resource that is the bottleneck for your load, and the resource doesn't support

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicole Harrington wri tes: --- Cy Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Meyer writes: Generally, more processors means things will go faster until you run out of threads. However, if there's some shared resource that is

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

On 2/7/07, Nicole Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246 Opteron cpu's) Now of course the world is shifting to Dual Core. Using FreeBSD, what is really the difference, besides

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

Andrew Hammond wrote: On 2/7/07, Nicole Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246 Opteron cpu's) Now of course the world is shifting to Dual Core. Using FreeBSD, what is really the

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

Nicole Harrington wrote: Hello all, I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246 Opteron cpu's) Now of course the world is shifting to Dual Core. Using FreeBSD, what is really the difference, besides power and ability to shove in

Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Nicole Harrington wrote: Using FreeBSD, what is really the difference, besides power and ability to shove in more memory, between having the two seperate CPUS's? Dual core or Quad Core CPUs performance are far better compared to