On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Christian Hiris wrote:
I think the official FreeBSD download page is
http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/ooomisc/FreeBSD/
All the packages I have seen there are ver. 1.1.3. for various FreeBSD
branches including 5.3.
Yes!!! I knew I got it
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice
(even though this is not listed as a dependency).
It is, actually. You only need linprocfs in order to build jdk14,
because bootstrapping a java compiler requires a java
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
There's been quite a few reports of people having trouble getting past
the java tools install which is needed to build the port. Unless that
challence is interesting in itself, it's probably more convenient to
download and install a binary
Dave Horsfall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't read
JP)...
OOPS. Looks like I did not look too closely. It certainly looks like
they haven't gotten around to
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't read
JP)...
OOPS. Looks like I did not look too closely. It certainly looks like
they haven't
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump through?
===Verifying install for /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac in
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:46:48PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump through?
You really do
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:10, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
There's been quite a few reports of people having trouble getting past
the java tools install which is needed to build the port. Unless that
challence is interesting in itself, it's
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:58, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:46:48PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:37 AM
To: Stijn Hoop; Dave Horsfall; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice?
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:58, Stijn Hoop wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 13:18, Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I can't actually see a package for 1.1.4 there.
unless those Japanese versions will work in Australia (and I don't
On 04 Jan 2005 07:40:23 +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice, for
which a freebsd binary is not produced
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump through?
I did it, and it wasn't hard, just confusing. It is confusing
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:04:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 21:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked
before), but this time it bombed near the end with a
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
Dave Horsfall wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html
And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops
do we have to jump
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:21:17PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:04:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked
before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip'
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:36:53PM -, John Conover wrote:
Is there a native 5.3 port of OpenOffice, or does it still have to run
under Linux compatability?
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice, for
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it's in the ports tree. I don't think we've ever included a
linux openoffice port - are you perhaps thinking of staroffice, for
which a freebsd binary is not produced by sun?
There's been quite a few reports of people having trouble getting past
20 matches
Mail list logo
