Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Doug Poland
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A

Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread David Gerard
Mark Rowlands ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030601 02:49]: On Saturday 31 May 2003 5:18 pm, Doug Poland wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:00:33AM +1000, David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work

Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Tom Snell
David Gerard wrote: OK. I know that after much fiddling with OOo 1.0.1 and FreeBSD 4.6.2, it came out that OOo basically just, er, didn't work on FreeBSD at that time. So. On the other box (FreeBSD 4.8), we've just installed OOo 1.0.2 from ports. A few days' compilation from source. It, er, sort

Re: OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 and FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE

2003-06-01 Thread Tim Kellers
I've been able to successfully build (and use) OpenOffice on 4.7-STABLE, 4.8-STABLE, and 5.1 BETA since 1.0.2 --I'm currently using 1.0.3. Before that, I had no success in building 1.0.0 or 1.0.1, (I didn't try building those versions on CURRENT)but I did have immediate success using the Linux