On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:31:08 +0200
Antonio Vieiro articulated:
> Below USD$50 would be perfect, below USD$75 would be not-so perfect.
That doesn't make any sense. I think what you mean is anything less
than $75 would be acceptable; however, a price below $50 would be
advantageous.
I think you sh
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 13:59:58 -0700
> From: ???
> Subject: Re: Recommended nVidia card for cuda/opencl on FreeBSD?
> To: FreeBSD
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Do you want CUDA 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.0, 2.1
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:37:28 +0200
> Antonio Vieiro articulated:
>
>> Would anyone on the list suggest a cheap nVidia replacement that can
>> do cuda/opencl?
>
> Define "cheap".
Below USD$50 would be perfect, below USD$75 would be not-so perfect.
Above that would be expensive just for experimen
Do you want CUDA 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.0, 2.1 compatible? I have a 9800GT
(pretty cheap now-a-days + it runs modern games), which has the lowest CUDA
1.0.
Also, I am interested in how you will do the work. Currently, it's necessary
to run the CUDA SDK and Toolkit under Linux emulation or chroot, d
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:37:28 +0200
Antonio Vieiro articulated:
> Would anyone on the list suggest a cheap nVidia replacement that can
> do cuda/opencl?
Define "cheap".
--
Jerry ✌
jerry+f...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored.
Do not CC this poster. Plea
