Re: Release Compiler options

2004-10-05 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2004 03:52 schrieb Haulmark, Chris: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emanuel Strobl Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Release Compiler options I really spent some

Re: Release Compiler options

2004-10-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2004 03:52 schrieb Haulmark, Chris: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emanuel Strobl Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:43 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: Release Compiler options

2004-10-05 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2004 12:00 schrieb Matthew Seaman: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:45:09AM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: [...] There is an excellent hint for compiler flags to be found in the 19.4.3 section of the FreeBSD handbook. Hm, this is for the world and is very well known and

Re: Release Compiler options

2004-10-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, so share/examples/etc/make.conf is not evaluated like etc/defautls/make.conf was before? That's the point I guess. /etc/defaults/make.conf was *never* evaluated. That's *why* it was moved out to the examples tree.

Re: Release Compiler options

2004-10-05 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:01:04AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, so share/examples/etc/make.conf is not evaluated like etc/defautls/make.conf was before? That's the point I guess. /etc/defaults/make.conf was *never* evaluated. That's *why* it

RE: Release Compiler options

2004-10-04 Thread Haulmark, Chris
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emanuel Strobl Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Release Compiler options I really spent some time tracing the make release, but couldn't find any way to