On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:22:36AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2003 at 10:58:28 +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:15:32PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
No takers?
I've been intending to do so, but there's not much I can do based on
the
On Tuesday, 18 March 2003 at 11:28:19 +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:22:36AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 17 March 2003 at 10:58:28 +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:15:32PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
No takers?
I've been
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:15:32PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone out there can shed any light on this:
A drive failed on one of our Vinum-powered RAID-5 arrays over the weekend.
This morning, we swapped out the offending drive (hot-swappable SCSI
hardware),
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:58:28AM +, Scott Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No takers? Maybe someone who's done this (replacing a failed Vinum drive
on hot-swap SCSI hardware) before can at least tell me whether:
- I should have done some camcontrol magic before rebuilding the
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:19:32PM +, Scott Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks -- you've confirmed what I suspected, that I could have avoided the
problems I saw by being a bit more cautious. My bad.
Out of interest though, why do you advise not putting critical data on a
Vinum
On Monday, 17 March 2003 at 10:58:28 +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:15:32PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if anyone out there can shed any light on this:
A drive failed on one of our Vinum-powered RAID-5 arrays over the weekend.
This morning, we
On Monday, 17 March 2003 at 18:37:46 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:19:32PM +, Scott Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks -- you've confirmed what I suspected, that I could have avoided the
problems I saw by being a bit more cautious. My bad.
Out of
